POLS 1140

Class Survey

Updated Mar 9, 2025

Wednesday

Plan

Today:

  • Sit with your groups

  • Overview of planned analyses

  • Take the draft survey

  • Propose any edits to the survey as needed

Friday:

  • Draft planned analyses

Next Monday:

  • Submit planned analyses
    • Optional class

Friday

Plan

  • Take revised survey

  • Draft planned analyses

  • Upload to canvas by Monday

  • Zoom office hours next week

Attendance Survey!

Click here to have all of your most pressing questions answered.

Help me with my fit

Our Fashion Advice

Option Choice Votes
Jacket Tweed 8
Palette Winter (Cool + Dark) 9
Pant Joggers 7
Patterns Keep it simple 9
Shoe Crocs 8
Tie Bow tie 11
Top Sports jersey 14

What would Derek Guy say?

Apparently, khakis are in right now, but the pairing of tuxedo, crocs, bow tie and soccer jersey remains a timeless combination. Thanks https://t.co/BwjiEndcvH https://t.co/4ZHF1FlcMS pic.twitter.com/PmipDRJ3MB

— Paul Testa (@ProfPaulTesta) March 19, 2024

Planned Analyses

Overview

By Monday, please submit a document on Canvas covering the following:

  • Project summary

  • Research design

  • Formal expectations

  • Empirical tests

Project summary

A three sentence summary of your project:

  • We are interested in…

  • To study this question we do…

  • We expect to find

Research design

A list of the key components of your design. This should include:

  • Overview of any random assignments.

  • The dependent variable(s)

    • Provide the question wording and response values (e.g. 1-100, 5 point scale, etc…)
    • Are you using an individual item or a scale of items
  • The key predictor variable(s)

    • If project contains an randomization, these will be treatment assignments
  • Other relevant predictors/covariates

Formal expectations

At least two formal expectations:

  • You can format these as hypotheses like H1 and H2 or as general expectations. However you write them, they should state in one sentence a clear, testable expectation.

  • Start with your most general expectation then move to more specific comparisons

  • Be specific. Instead of saying “We expect political knowledge to vary with media use” say, “H1: We expect that political knowledge will increase with news consumption”

Empirical tests

Translate these expectations into empirically testable implications.

  • Think in terms of means or averages, or regression coefficients.

    • Maybe write down the formula of a regression model you’d like to estimate (feel free to use ChatGPT for help formatting)
  • If H1 is true, then the average level of political knowledge among high news consumption respondents should be higher than the average level of political knowledge among low news consumption respondents.

Revising the Survey

Overview

You can download the current pdf of the current draft of survey here

Then click here

Updates

  • Removed political participation measures

  • Combined Evaluations of Dem and Rep music preferences

  • Removed general questions about celebrity endorsements

  • Removed FT for journalists, academics and college students

  • Any specific edits to news articles/treatments

Group 1

  • I cut the learning question, if you want it back, think about another matrix question you could cut.

  • Randomized the order of perceived ideology and perceived trust. Do you think this will have an effect?

Group 2

  • Three treatment conditions:

    • No information
    • News article with Liberal source cue
    • News article with Conservative source cue
  • How do you fill about the outcome measures?

Group 3

  • Two treatment conditions:

    • Evaluate partisan music prefences first
    • Evaluate you own music preferences first
  • If there’s an order effect, what would we expect?

  • Do you think we could combine the Democrat/Republican items into a single measure?

Group 4

  • I think we may get to only ask one of the two long matrix questions
  • which do you prefer?
  • Any changes you would make?
  • What variables from the rest of the survey do you think explain variation

Group 5

  • Two treatments:

    • Celeb evaluations
    • Celeb evaluations with stated endorsements
  • How do you expect evaluations to differ across these conditions?

  • Can we cut g5_general?

Group 6

  • Any changes to these questions? Add

  • What predictors do you think will explain variation in response?

  • How should we code state of residence?

Group 8

  • Any additional responses/items you want to add to the matrix?

  • Do you envision a single scale (e.g. skepticism about the voter fraud) or individual items

  • What do you think will explain variation in people’s answers?

Group 9

Three treatment conditions:

  • Neutral/Tax Foundation
  • Liberal/NYT
  • Conservative/WSJ

Any changes to the content of the treatment? Can we make it shorter? Punchier?

POLS 1140

1
POLS 1140 Class Survey Updated Mar 9, 2025

  1. Slides

  2. Tools

  3. Close
  • POLS 1140
  • Wednesday
  • Plan
  • Friday
  • Plan
  • Attendance Survey!
  • Help me with my fit
  • Our Fashion Advice
  • What would Derek Guy say?
  • Planned Analyses
  • Overview
  • Project summary
  • Research design
  • Formal expectations
  • Empirical tests
  • Revising the Survey
  • Overview
  • Updates
  • Group 1
  • Group 2
  • Group 3
  • Group 4
  • Group 5
  • Group 6
  • Group 8
  • Group 9
  • f Fullscreen
  • s Speaker View
  • o Slide Overview
  • e PDF Export Mode
  • r Scroll View Mode
  • ? Keyboard Help